Tag Archives: State voucher proposals

It’s Time to Rally for School Choice!

Governor Kasich recently proposed an exciting education reform plan that includes an income-based scholarship program that would help more Ohio families send their children to the school of their choice!

It’s time to show our support for Governor Kasich’s income-based scholarship program, and we need your help! School Choice Ohio invites you to the Ohio Statehouse for a massive rally to encourage Ohio’s leaders to support expanded school choice.

Rally for School Choice
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
11 a.m.
West Plaza of the Ohio Statehouse

We all know that when it comes to education, one size does not fit all. All children deserve a quality education, regardless of their income or zip code.

We rallied once before in 2011, and the support was overwhelming! This time we want a rally that is even bigger and better.

Come to the Ohio Statehouse on April 10th to show your support! If you’re interested in participating, sign up here today for more information. Simply include your contact information and the number of people you would like to bring to the Rally for School Choice. We hope to see you there!

School Choice Advocacy Days are a success!

School Choice Ohio’s School Choice Advocacy Days were a huge success!

We invited people from all over the state to come to the Ohio Statehouse to meet with legislators. They shared their personal stories about why school choice is so important, and their support for expanding school choice to more Ohio families.

The members from the House of Representatives were happy to take time out of their day to meet with us, and discuss what school choice means for all of Ohio’s families. During the meetings, we also had the opportunity to share with Ohio’s leaders why Governor Kasich’s income-based scholarship program proposal is so vital for our state.

Representative Smith

We would like to give a big shout out to all of the moms, dads, students, teachers and school leaders who took time out of their busy schedules to make the trip here to be an advocate for expanded school choice. It’s important that we keep letting our legislators know why Ohio needs school choice and needs to expand it so more families can send their children to the school of their choice!

If you weren’t able to make it to one of the School Choice Advocacy Days, don’t worry! You still have a chance to advocate for school choice at our upcoming Rally for School Choice on April 10th. Interested? Sign up for more information here.

Representative Huffman

Representative Beck

Representative Driehaus

Representative Adams

House Education Committee Accepts Substitute Version of PACT Scholarship Bill

Relatively unnoticed with all of the debate about the state budget, on June 15 the members of the House Education committee accepted a substitute version of House Bill 136. HB136, introduced earlier this year by State Representative Matt Huffman (R – Lima), creates a new PACT scholarship. The PACT scholarship would be available to most students in the state with the only limiting factor being family income.

Among the key changes in the amended bill is a provision restoring the eligibility of current private school students whose families meet the income eligibility guidelines. A previously introduced substitute bill would have made these students ineligible. This change brings more balance to parents across Ohio who are struggling to make ends meet while providing educational opportunities for their children.

The eligibility for private school students would again be phased-in over a four year period, beginning with kindergarten students in the 2012-2013 school year, students in grades K-4 in 2013-2014, students in grades K-8 in the 2014-2015 school year, and all students in grades K-12 in the 2015-2016 school year.

Another significant change in the latest version of the bill will limit the number of scholarships per year that may be awarded to students from any one school district to the number that can be financed by the aggregate amount of that district’s “state education aid.” While always the intention of the law, this provision clarifies the locally generated levy money cannot be used to fund scholarships.

This clarification was made to help to ease concerns which had been raised by some legislators who feared that their school districts would be required to transfer funding to private schools that would exceed the amount of state funding the district receives. High-wealth public school districts that receive little in the way of state aid, sometimes as little as $500 per student, were concerned that the scholarship funding would dip into local tax coffers.

House Bill 136 has, as of June 15, received six hearings in the House Education Committee. With the legislature on break for summer recess through the middle of September, now is the time for advocates to call and meet with their state legislators and encourage them to support the PACT Scholarship when they return to Columbus in the fall. Wondering who your state legislators are? You can find their names and contact information at www.schoolchoiceadvocates.org.

 

Cleveland voucher co-pay removed in Senate proposal

Today the Senate proposed a further improvement to the Cleveland school voucher program: the elimination of the current required parent co-pay.

Until now, parents have had to pay 10% or 25% of the $3,450 scholarship amount themselves. This is in addition to uniforms, application fees, and other costs that are not covered by the scholarship. Most of the families using this program are low-income, so a high percentage of many families’ annual income was required to utilize the scholarship.

SCO Director Chad Aldis began calling for the elimination of the parent co-pay provision in a presentation to the State Board of Education last year.

Together with changes added in the House version of the budget that would create eligibility for high school applicants and equity in the funding amount with EdChoice and Cleveland, this represents a major set of improvements for Cleveland students.

The Senate changes – which also include the creation of a Special Education Scholarship that they are naming for special education advocate and champion of the Autism Scholarship Program former Representative Jon Peterson – are likely to be approved by the full Senate this week. It will then move on to the “conference committee,” the small group of legislators designated to hammer out the differences between the House and Senate versions of the state budget and send a combined proposal to Governor Kasich for his signature.

 

State Budget: Proposed Impact on School Vouchers

The two-year state budget process is moving forward, and it is taking school vouchers forward with it.

Today, the Ohio Senate proposed the creation of a Special Education Scholarship, much to the delight of the many families who have been sharing their stories with legislators for the past several months and years. The Senate also maintained the school voucher expansions proposed in the Ohio House and Senate.

Senate’s Special Education Scholarship proposal:

  • For many years, parents of students with special needs have been asking for the same opportunities that students with autism already enjoy with the Autism Scholarship.
  • The Autism Scholarship is a proven program that is making a difference for students. This scholarship expands eligibility beyond just one type of disability.
  • A special education scholarship would allow any student with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to receive a voucher worth approximately 80% of their public school funding.
  • The program is capped at 5% of the students in the state with special needs which would provide just more than 13,000 scholarship opportunities statewide.

House of Representatives’ proposed expansions (proposed in April):

  • Increase the Cleveland voucher amount to parity with the EdChoice Scholarship. Cleveland vouchers are now worth $1,100-$1,900 less than EdChoice, just because they’re in a different city. The House proposal addresses this historical inequity.
  • Allow high school students to apply for a Cleveland voucher to address another historical inequity in the Cleveland voucher versus the EdChoice voucher – the inability of students of high school age to access a Cleveland voucher. The House proposal would allow Cleveland students in any grade to apply for a voucher.

Governor Kasich’s proposed expansions (proposed in March):

  • Expand eligibility for the EdChoice Scholarship by adding a 2nd definition of low-rated schools based on performance index score. This change is estimated to increase EdChoice eligibility by more than 60% from 85,000 to 140,000 students.
  • Quadruple the number of EdChoice Scholarships available to eliminate the current waiting list for families
  • Add a summer EdChoice application window to allow newly-eligible families to apply for the upcoming school year.

All of these proposals build on each other and would mean major increases in voucher eligibility for Ohio families. If all these changes pass, eligibility would nearly quadruple from 120,000 to 440,000 and the number of vouchers available in capped programs would increase from 20,000 to almost 80,000 spots.

Voucher Program Current Capacity Proposed Capacity Current Eligibility Proposed Eligibility
EdChoice Scholarship 14,000 60,000 85,000 140,000*
Special Education/Autism n/a 13,000 15,000 260,000
Cleveland voucher 6,000 6,000 26,000 40,000
Total: 20,000 79,000 121,000 440,000

* estimated

The state budget is required to be finalized by June 30, after the House and Senate hammer out the differences between their versions in June.

 

“I Wish I Had a Choice” Barb’s Story

While 20,000 students in Ohio are using a state voucher to attend the private school of their choice, many students are shut out because they do not meet the narrow eligibility guidelines of the current voucher programs. In this ongoing series, we share stories from just a few of the families who wish that they, too, had a choice.

I was very excited when I learned that my daughter was able to get an EdChoice Scholarship because the middle school she was enrolled in was failing.  I enrolled her in a private, Christian school, which she loves. It was a night-and-day difference from her previous school. She came home telling me about all the things she was learning that she hadn’t learned in public school. She also noticed the positive attitudes of students and staff. Rather than loud, rowdy students pushing their way through hallways, the students in her new school were quieter, more orderly, and full of joy.

I am so grateful to have the EdChoice scholarship for my oldest daughter, but I am very disappointed that my other children are not able to access that same opportunity because they are enrolled in a school that is not failing. Although their school is not in the lowest 5% of the state’s schools, it still is not the environment that I would choose for them or an environment that I feel is helping them reach their highest potential. I wish all my children could go to a private Christian school for free, not just one of my kids.  I hold onto that hope, wishing I had a choice.

When it rains it pours: House proposes new Tax Credit Scholarship

We have exciting news from the Statehouse: Representatives Brenner (R) and Patmon (D) have introduced House Bill 242, scholarship tax credit legislation in the Ohio House today. The new program would give dollar-for-dollar tax credits to people and businesses that donate to nonprofit scholarship-granting organizations.

The bill is similar to legislation filed in the Senate by Senator Jordan (Senate Bill 88), but it uses a lower income threshold of 1.5 times reduced price lunch income guidelines ($61,000 for a family of 4). Both public school and private school students would be eligible to apply. The K-8 scholarship amount would be $4,250 and the high school max would be $7,000.

The bill came out of the gates with bipartisan support. Four Democrats have joined 16 Republicans as sponsor or cosponsor of HB 242. Here is a full list of the legislators that are signed on to support the tax credit scholarship proposal so far:

Sponsors: Representatives Brenner, Patmon

Cosponsors: Representatives Driehaus, Barnes, Butler, Maag, Newbold, Henne, Yuko, Young, Sears, Wachtmann, McClain, Huffman, Boose, Adams, J., Beck, Uecker, Stebelton, Blessing

Please take time to send these legislators thank you notes and encourage their support. Also, please take this opportunity to contact your local representatives and let them know that you hope they will vote “YES” on HB 242. You can find your legislators’ contact information at www.schoolchoiceadvocates.org.

This bill joins with several other major proposed expansions of school choice that are pending in the legislature (see here and here).

 

“I Wish I Had a Choice” Angela’s Story

While 20,000 students in Ohio are using a state voucher to attend the private school of their choice, many students are shut out because they do not meet the narrow eligibility guidelines of the current voucher programs. In this ongoing series, we share stories from just a few of the families who wish that they, too, had a choice.

As a parent, I always see beyond my children’s disability to their potential.  I expect their educators to do the same.  Giving up on our most vulnerable is never an option.  It is my children’s hopes, goals and dreams that will motivate them to live a long, healthy life.  It is my responsibility to ensure they obtain the tools they need to help them reach these goals to the very best of their abilities.  Furthermore, I know that doing whatever necessary today to maintain their health and to keep them out of harm’s way will secure the promise of their tomorrows.

Our district’s attitude towards my children’s education is best summed up by the words of one of their own principals.  This is what he said to me after I confronted him about my concerns regarding the safety of the buildings as they relate to my children; concerns which, as I said, were shared by several of their own staff members:  “Ms. Dawson, I don’t know quite how to say this, but it doesn’t seem to matter what kind of accommodations we make for your kids, their outcome will still be the same and I’m sure you’ve thought about that.”  In other words, the district believes that it’s a waste of their time and energy to provide an education that my children will not be able to use since they are going to die anyway.

The education provided by this district is inadequate and the environment is both emotionally and physically toxic.  I believe that placing my children in the hands of individuals who believe that they are a waste of time, space and energy is neglectful and irresponsible and it’s simply not an option.  If any of their healthcare providers behaved as their educators have I would have run out the door and never looked back.  It simply isn’t right that I am not afforded that option when it comes to their education.  I shouldn’t have to fight this hard to protect my children from these horrors and it certainly should not cost us 4 years of our life.

It is clearly time to hold our districts accountable for their role in our children’s futures.  Giving parents a freedom to choose what’s best for their children is the first step to bringing that accountability. I’m thankful today that many of you are finally listening to the desperate cries of our exceptional children and their families.  And I’m hopeful that all of you will support this much-needed bill and the special education scholarship.

“I Wish I Had a Choice” Wallisha’s Story

While 20,000 students in Ohio are using a state voucher to attend the private school of their choice, many students are shut out because they do not meet the narrow eligibility guidelines of the current voucher programs. In this ongoing series, we share stories from just a few of the families who wish that they, too, had a choice.

Like all parents, the quality of my child’s education is of utmost importance to me.  It is the duty of parents and politicians alike to place the education of the children of this state in its proper place as a priority and to find ways to achieve that goal that are cost effective for families as well as government.

When parents are given a choice of sending their children to an excellent school as opposed to an average or inadequate school, the choice is clear and obvious.  When government is given the choice of propelling its future generations’ education and potential for productivity forward through innovative programs such as the PACT Scholarship, as opposed to the status quo, the choice should be equally clear and obvious.  If the cost of such innovation is less to the family and to the state and will save hundreds of thousands of dollars as opposed to business as usual, then the choice should be clear and obvious.

Our children are our biggest investment and setting them up to succeed with a better quality of education today means that the workforce and business leaders of tomorrow will be better prepared to lead our communities, cities, state and country.  The fact that unused scholarship money can be applied towards a college education at an Ohio college, university, or post high school institution is a built-in incentive for students who would be less inclined to pursue higher learning for financial reasons.  It would also serve as proof positive that our school systems are truly invested in their future.

“I Wish I Had a Choice” Heather’s story

While 20,000 students in Ohio are using a state voucher to attend the private school of their choice, many students are shut out because they do not meet the narrow eligibility guidelines of the current voucher programs. In this ongoing series, we share stories from just a few of the families who wish that they, too, had a choice.

All is not what it seems when it comes to “affording” private schools. People equate having children in private schools with having the means to pay tuition. I currently have my own children in Catholic school, but, NO, my husband and I actually don’t have any means to do it. We are making huge sacrifices to pay and receiving help from our church and community because we have seen with our older children how lost they were in public school and we want something different for our younger kids.

In 2006, we had to file for a Chapter 13 bankruptcy to save our house, because I was constantly off of work due to illness and surgeries. In 2007, I suffered a near fatal injury to one of my lungs. I became disabled and have not been able to work since January 2009. I am currently awaiting a hearing with the Social Security Administration for benefits.

My daughter had JUST been enrolled and we had already signed our tuition contract right before I exhausted my FMLA time at my employer. Once she completed kindergarten, we faced the very difficult decision of whether to keep her in or not. We knew that she was better attended to by the private school staff since enrollment was lower, and she is being taught core values of our faith as well. We opted to keep her there and suffer the sacrifices.

My husband works 1 full-time job and 2 part-time jobs. We get 90 percent of our food from local food pantries. We have faced shut off on our utilities numerous times and there is no end in sight until I get my day in court with Social Security. How do I choose though, to pull my daughter out of a phenomenal school where she is learning SO much more than a public school student of the same age? At 6, she already can do fractions, double digit addition and subtraction, can read chapter books, and knows all her punctuations and how to use them. Just because my husband and I don’t have high-paying jobs doesn’t mean we don’t want the best for our children’s education.

While some feel that only public school students should be able to able to direct their child’s education funds to the school of their choice, I would say that private school students should have the same opportunity. After all, aren’t we paying the same taxes as our neighbors? I speak for thousands of others when I convey how much help families need, even if their children are already enrolled in private school.